I am feeling pretty sour today following last night's carve - up of top European jobs. I've never been mugged (touch wood, etc.) but I feel that's what's happened to me and 500 million others in the political sense. Who needs 'The Thick of It' when real political life is beyond satire? A foreign minister for 27 nations and 500 million people, who has never been elected to anything and didn't even know she was a candidate until just before she was appointed, to a job created by a Treaty which only 1% of the electorate has had any say in (and the 1% - in Ireland - only approved after being told to vote again as they got the 'wrong' answer the first time), who was originally appointed as a Commissioner by a Prime Minister – who doesn't have a mandate in THAT job - so that he could bring back another unelected Minister back into his Cabinet.
Why didn't the new Papacy go the whole hog and have smoke billowing out when the 'Cardinals' had made their decision? The demos, of course, excluded from it all.
But THEY seem more concerned with foul play at a European footie match than in the autocratic way they are now governed. FFS!! Still, never mind, we can still vote in The X Factor' and 'Strictly'. Probably have more affect than a vote in a general election now when the real power has shifted to those whom we do not elect and cannot remove. Weapons of Mass Distraction keep the electorate from having to worry about such matters. The other Blair – Eric – got it bang on in '1984' (which was seen as a warning against creeping totalitarianism but seems to have been used as a text book by New Labour and the EU).
"The Party seeks power entirely for its own sake. We are not interested in the good of others; we are interested solely in power. Not wealth or luxury or long life or happiness: only power, pure power. What pure power means you will understand presently. We are different from all the oligarchies of the past, in that we know what we are doing. All the others, even those who resembled ourselves, were cowards and hypocrites. The German Nazis and the Russian Communists came very close to us in their methods, but they never had the courage to recognize their own motives. They pretended, perhaps they even believed, that they had seized power unwillingly and for a limited time, and that just round the corner there lay a paradise where human beings would be free and equal. We are not like that. We know that no one ever seizes power with the intention of relinquishing it. Power is not a means; it is an end. One does not establish a dictatorship in order to safeguard a revolution; one makes the revolution in order to establish the dictatorship. The object of persecution is persecution. The object of torture is torture. The object of power is power."
Of course, 'Cathy' Ashton insists she will be a good 'High Commissioner' but if not, what? Gordon Brown tried to bluff his way out of the 'democratic deficit' issue last night by stating that she and the new 'President' were chosen by elected heads of government of the 27 EU states (a rather tendentious claim in his case, given that he is PM using a Commons' majority secured in an election in 2005 at which the then PM and party leader, Blair, stated categorically that he would be there for the full term and "a full term means a full term" – but let that pass. This morning Neil Kinnock made a similar claim - that's Lord, Neil Kinnock, the former EU Commissioner, whose wife and son have also done well out of the EU and will continue to do through salaries and lavish pensions paid for by us, a body that Kinnock pledged to take Britain out of through the '70s and most of the '80s; indeed Brown and Blair were first elected in 1983, with a manifesto pledge to withdraw from the then EEC without a referendum. But let THAT pass! The idea that ANY of these leaders, with the possible exception of the Irish, have any mandate to transfer these powers and make these appointments is outrageous!
Then we get the point – unchallenged by the BBC's Justin Webb on the 'Today' show this morning, that this is no different from Cabinet appointments in the U.S. Well, of course, such appointments are made by a directly elected President (unlike Brown and many other heads of government in the UK) but, crucially, there ALL appointments are subject to intense Congressional scrutiny and approval. Obama took months to get one of his key appointments approved. Whereas, the EU Parliament (members mostly elected under the party list system, rather than as individuals) can either accept ALL the appointments, or refuse them all – they cannot pick and choose, and neither can they vote to remove one of these super-ministers during their term if, say, 'Kathy' is not up to snuff.
Two more frequently quoted claims about the EU that went unchallenged: the Lib Dem's (former EU Commissar) Chris Huhne on 'Question Time' last night repeated the old one that the EU was run by fewer people than run Birmingham City Council. That comparison is intended to suggest that there are few bureaucrats in the whole of the EU than in Birmingham – the biggest local authority in Europe – but in Brum's case the figure includes all the frontline staff; teachers, social workers, etc. A deliberate piece of misinformation. But Huhne has form on this. He also recently repeated the line that the EU had "kept the peace in Europe." This is the one that sends me into orbit! What kept the peace in Europe of course up to the early '80s was the division of the Continent into broadly two military camps, NATO and Warsaw Pact, both armed with nuclear weapons and each side's integrity guaranteed respectively by the USA and USSR, and Germany - the chief, initial aggressor in the two world wars - split into two, one side in each camp. Just who, I wonder, does Huhne - and others who repeat this –think would have been at war but for the EEC/EU? Would Ireland have invaded Denmark? France gone for Belgium? It's just ludicrous! The proof of my position that the Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD) prevented another war in Europe, is that when the Soviet bloc collapsed in the early '90s there WAS war in Europe!
The biggest threat in Europe remains regional and ethnic/religious wars, not between nation states. I would even contend that the divorce of the elite from the people is MORE likely to lead to tensions, which may result in violence.
SO: what is to be done? Do we just sigh, roll our eyes, shrug our shoulders, etc. and get on with our lives, and hope no one will come and get us for running foul of some EU Directive or be dragged from our homes to some other EU country using the European Arrest Warrant? (And do be careful, by the way, guys, that you don't commit anything that might be construed as a sex crime when visiting the Czech Republic – they have the unkindest cut of all for certain types of miscreants there).
Passive resistance is probably the best way forward. The EU has no legitimacy, no mandate, so should be ignored and defied. They can't throw all of us in prison. But of course people won't do it. Britain is such a wussy nation - with those Weapons of Mass Distraction as giant, electronic pacifiers. As yer man Lennon said in 'Working Class Hero':
Keep you doped with religion and sex and TV,
And you think you're so clever and classless and free,
But you're still fucking peasants as far as I can see
It took centuries to establish some sort of democracy in the UK (let alone most of the rest of Europe) and now 'they' have - by Treaty, Directive, lie and misinformation -taken it away. Yes, we are back to the future in a new, post-democratic age.